advice on the use of GFS2 over stipped LVM?
Regards.
Footnotes:
[1]
http://community.hpe.com/t5/System-Administration/Need-to-move-the-data-from-Linear-LV-to-stripped-LV-on-RHEL-5-7/td-p/6134323
--
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
Fingerprint: 3E69 014E
over 80% use of the GFS2 can produce
such workload?
Regards.
--
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster
have a set of patches that are
> experimental, and not even in the upstream kernel yet (hopefully soon!)
> that try to tighten up and fix problems like this. It's much more common
> for multiple nodes to try to transition from Unlinked to Free, and they
> all fail, leaving the file in an
Bob Peterson <rpete...@redhat.com> writes:
[...]
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I'm downloading the metadata now. I'll let you know what I find.
> It may take a while because my storage is a bit in flux at the moment.
Ok, thanks a lot for looking at our problems.
Regards.
--
Daniel Deh
Daniel Dehennin <daniel.dehen...@baby-gnu.org> writes:
[...]
> I push everything on an HTTP server[1]:
>
> - gfs2-fsck.log is the output of “fsck.gfs2 -p ”
>
> - gfs2-fsck-forced.log is the output of “fsck.gfs2 -f -p ”
>
> - gfs2.meta.gz is the “gfs2_edit savemet
Daniel Dehennin <daniel.dehen...@baby-gnu.org> writes:
[...]
> I preferred to do the fsck on the filesystem, two times[1], instead of
> the “gfs2_edit savemeta”:
>
> 1. “fsck.gfs2 -p ” was quick
> 2. “fsck.gfs2 -f -p ” took 4 hours
[...]
> Footnotes:
>
Daniel Dehennin <daniel.dehen...@baby-gnu.org> writes:
> Thanks, I'm using 3.1.6.
>
> Tonight I'll build the version 3.1.8 from Git[1] and run “fsck.gfs2 -p” on
> the fs.
Hello,
I preferred to do the fsck on the filesystem, two times[1], instead of
the “gfs2_edit savemeta”:
hosted.org/cgit/gfs2-utils.git/tag/?h=3.1.8
--
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
emeta” command looks stange to me:
There are 1073479680 blocks of 4096 bytes in the destination device.
Reading resource groups...Done. File system size: 1023.734M
Is it saying my FS is 1TB instead of the real 4TB?
Regards.
--
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2D
Daniel Dehennin <daniel.dehen...@baby-gnu.org> writes:
[...]
> We are using 3.1.6-0ubuntu1.
>
> Running an fsck is quite expensive for us, 4 hours with the shared FS
> unusable.
>
> I forgot to say that it stores qcow2 images, so there should not be
> concurrenc
node at a
time, except for monitoring which is read only.
So “looks like it is trying to free a block that is already marked as
being free” looks strange.
Regards.
--
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E
was not sufficient (2 crashes
the same day)
The nodes run on Ubuntu Trusty Thar up to date.
Do you have any idea?
Regards.
--
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF
Feb 10 09:08:08 nebula3 kernel
442791.612680] RSP
Sep 16 15:46:28 nebula3 kernel: [442791.617436] CR2: 0028
Sep 16 15:46:28 nebula3 kernel: [442791.628730] ---[ end trace 0f6f4a48b58f5fb0
]---
After a reboot of the hardware and starting the pacemaker stack, it's running.
I just loose some VMs in transient
ring0_addr: 192.168.231.132
name: nebula4
}
}
#+end_src
> Everything else looks fine...
Thanks.
I wonder how to see where it fails before succeeding.
Regards.
--
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C
1084811139 quorate 1 ring seq 1460 1460
daemon now 11026 fence_pid 0
node 1084811139 M add 455 rem 0 fail 0 fence 0 at 0 0
node 1084811140 M add 455 rem 0 fail 0 fence 0 at 0 0
Regards.
--
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23
-multipath.
I'll see if I can have another LUN to check the raw speed of the block
device.
Regards.
--
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Linux-cluster
: 5.51ms
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 633.1250/146.90
execution time (avg/stddev): 1.0239/0.33
Footnotes:
[1] https://git.samba.org/?p=ctdb.git;a=blob;f=utils/ping_pong/ping_pong.c
[2] https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ping_pong
--
Daniel
: 1084811138)
This fencing works.
Do you have any idea?
Regards.
--
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF
Apr 1 01:29:03 nebula4 lvm[6759]: Waiting for next pre command
Apr 1 01:29:03 nebula4 lvm[6759
Skipped active node 1223141568: born-on=22636, last-seen=22696,
this-event=22696, last-event=22692
Is there any documentation on troubleshooting DLM/cLVM?
Regards.
--
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B
19 matches
Mail list logo
