Re: [Linux-cluster] Samba Statefull Failover

Make sure you use virtual public ip addresses managed by CTDB, not the ones bound to your NICS. Frank. From: linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com [linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Abhijith Das [a...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:33

[Linux-cluster] Clustering and Cluster-Storage channels

) Beta (Channel Details) Consumes a regular entitlement (13 available) Thera are cluster beta channels, but not the release ones. How can we subscribe systems to them? Thanks and Regards. Frank -- Aquest missatge ha estat analitzat per MailScanner a la cerca de virus i d'altres conting

Re: [Linux-cluster] lock_dlm but local flocks = true?

so sure now, and that is it is a OpenVZ patched kernel. Can this have something to do with gfs mounts? Thanks for your help once more. Frank Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:15:28 + From: Steven Whitehouse To: linux clustering Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] lock_dlm but local flocks = true? Mes

Re: [Linux-cluster] lock_dlm but local flocks = true?

Local caching = FALSE Oopses OK = FALSE it says 'Mounted lock proto = "lock_dlm" ' because that is what I did. So why is it using "local flocks"? Frank Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:15:46 + From: Steven Whitehouse To: linux clustering Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] lo

[Linux-cluster] lock_dlm but local flocks = true?

Hi, I'm running RHEL 5.4 with a GFS1 filesystem (over a SAN) After checking the "ping_pong" test on the gfs filesystem I noticed counters was too much high, like doing the test with a local filesystem. But gfs filesystem is mounted with "lock_dlm" option. The only strange thing I see is in "gfs

Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS performance test

n_heraclito" passwd="*"/> login="root" name="IPMILan_parmenides" passwd="*"/> - Shared disk is a LUN on a fibber channel SAN. The most surprising thing is that we have another similar cluster, and there we get "98 locks/sec" always, st

[Linux-cluster] GFS performance test

Thanks for your help. Frank -- Aquest missatge ha estat analitzat per MailScanner a la cerca de virus i d'altres continguts perillosos, i es considera que està net. For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@redhat.com

[Linux-cluster] cluster just for GFS

devices but if there is no really any cluster resource do fence devices do something? I forgot to mention that we have set GFS filesystem to be mounted on boot ("/etc/init.d/gfs start" and the GFS filesystem is defined in /etc/fstab). Is there any better approach? Thanks for your he

[Linux-cluster] Re: processes stalled reading gfs filesystem

e_cache_readahead+0x1ab/0x1cc [] do_page_fault+0x2a4/0x5ad [] do_page_fault+0x0/0x5ad [] error_code+0x4f/0x54 [] __inet6_check_established+0x21f/0x394 Any ideas? Thanks. Frank > Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:20:47 +0100 > From: Frank > Subject: [Linux-cluster] processes stalled reading gfs filesystem &g

[Linux-cluster] processes stalled reading gfs filesystem

/openoffice/program @pagein-common What can be the problem? A corruption in the filesystem? should a "gfs_fsck" fix the problem? Regards. Frank -- Aquest missatge ha estat analitzat per MailScanner a la cerca de virus i d'altres continguts perillosos, i es considera que està net.