On 07/11/13 13:35 +0800, Zama Ques wrote:
>> A. The host "%s" is already a member of cluster "%s"
>>
>> or
>>
>> B. %s is already a member of a cluster named "%s"
>>
>> or some other message (interpolate "%s" above with your values)?
>>
>>
>>> But the node name is not there in cluster.conf fil
> A. The host "%s" is already a member of cluster "%s"
> or
> B. %s is already a member of a cluster named "%s"
> or some other message (interpolate "%s" above with your values)?
> But the node name is not there in cluster.conf file.
> you are talking about the original surviving node now,
Hello Zama,
picking just the luci bits below and supposing you are using RHEL 6
generation luci,
On 04/11/13 18:40 +0800, Zama Ques wrote:
> We are having a node two cluster with manual fencing configuration.
> One of the node died because of some hardware issue and we removed
> the dead node fro
Hi All ,
Thanks all for the replies . Let me make myself clear . I should have added it
in the original mail.
I did not configured manual fencing and our cluster was a two node cluster
without any fencing device added . But when one of the nodes failed , the
other node is refusing to join th
On 04/11/13 11:18, David Teigland wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:31:08AM -0500, Digimer wrote:
> We are having a node two cluster with manual fencing configuration .
An HA cluster with manual fencing is no cluster at all.
>>>
>>> No. It is a cluster. But it provides no high avail
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:31:08AM -0500, Digimer wrote:
> >>> We are having a node two cluster with manual fencing configuration .
> >>
> >> An HA cluster with manual fencing is no cluster at all.
> >
> > No. It is a cluster. But it provides no high availability.
>
> Let me echo Zama and Michael
On 04/11/13 08:33, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am Montag, 4. November 2013, 18:50:33 schrieb Rajagopal Swaminathan:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Zama Ques wrote:
>>> Hi ,
>>>
>>> We are having a node two cluster with manual fencing configuration .
>>
>> An HA cluster with
Am Montag, 4. November 2013, 18:50:33 schrieb Rajagopal Swaminathan:
> Greetings,
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Zama Ques wrote:
> > Hi ,
> >
> > We are having a node two cluster with manual fencing configuration .
>
> An HA cluster with manual fencing is no cluster at all.
No. It is a c
Greetings,
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Zama Ques wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> We are having a node two cluster with manual fencing configuration .
An HA cluster with manual fencing is no cluster at all.
--
Regards,
Rajagopal
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
https://www.redh
Hi ,
We are having a node two cluster with manual fencing configuration . One of the
node died because of some hardware issue and we removed the dead node from the
cluster using the following commands.
fence_manual -n db2.example.com
fence_ack_manual -n db2.example.com
The faulty
.
=
From: emmanuel segura
To: Zama Ques ; linux clustering
Sent: Wednesday, 6 March 2013 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Adding a Node back to cluster failing
Hello Zama
Where is your cluster config?
Thanks
2013/3/6 Zama
Hello Zama
Where is your cluster config?
Thanks
2013/3/6 Zama Ques
> Hi All,
>
> We are using a two node cluster using centOS 5.5 on HP Proliant Servers .
> One of the our servers in the cluster failed and is not booting up . There
> was a hardware issue on the server , so we removed the node
Hi All,
We are using a two node cluster using centOS 5.5 on HP Proliant Servers . One
of the our servers in the cluster failed and is not booting up . There was a
hardware issue on the server , so we removed the node from the cluster and also
removed it from fencing domain.
Now our cluster s
13 matches
Mail list logo
