essage-
From: Jason Fitzpatrick [mailto:jayfitzpatr...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 22 juni 2010 10:40
To: Kit Gerrits
Cc: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Basic Active Active File Server
Hi Kit..
Awesome and all as I am when it comes to computers, networking is a
serious
w
il.com]
Sent: dinsdag 22 juni 2010 10:40
To: Kit Gerrits
Cc: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Basic Active Active File Server
Hi Kit..
Awesome and all as I am when it comes to computers, networking is a serious
weak point ;0)
How would I go about checking if multicast traffic is mak
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com
[mailto:linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com]
> On Behalf Of Jason Fitzpatrick
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:40 AM
> To: Kit Gerrits
> Cc: linux clustering
> Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Basic Active Activ
t;
>> Kit
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com
>> [mailto:linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jason Fitzpatrick
>> Sent: maandag 21 juni 2010 18:14
>> To: linux clustering
>> Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Basic Act
maandag 21 juni 2010 18:14
> To: linux clustering
> Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Basic Active Active File Server
>
> Hi..
>
> I have tried both multicast and broadcast to no avail, as above I am moving
> the systems to the same ESX to try and rule out the networking end of
> thing
Of Jason Fitzpatrick
Sent: maandag 21 juni 2010 18:14
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Basic Active Active File Server
Hi..
I have tried both multicast and broadcast to no avail, as above I am moving
the systems to the same ESX to try and rule out the networking end of
things, I
Greets.
For what it's worth, I have had a similar problem, with our central
networking
department telling me that "it should work". I have had a single node
unable to
join the 3-node cluster I'm currently trying to get working. All
physical machines,
no VMs.
Solution: Hook them all up on the
Hi..
I have tried both multicast and broadcast to no avail, as above I am
moving the systems to the same ESX to try and rule out the networking
end of things, I have not tried the tcpdump but was running wireshark
in an attempt to do the same as you recommended
Jay
On 21 June 2010 16:49, Kaloyan
Hi Paul..
I have done a crm_tool leave force on the nodes in an attempt to get
them to join back in, but they simply form a cluster on their own. I
have asked about the igmp and have been told that it is not running on
the network,
Since this is a test system I have built it on ESX, one node in e
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:07:34 +0100, Jason Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am having no end of trouble getting a basic Active Active Cluster
> working. at the moment it is in test / proof of concept and has manual
> fencing in place but I cannot for the life of me get the 2 nodes to
> join t
By "cannot join", do you mean the logs actually report "failed to join" or
do they join, then one gets fenced?
If the latter, ask your network team if they're using igmp snoop and/or igmp
query. If so, it's likely they only do igmp v2 and you'll need to force v2
on your interfaces via sysctl.conf.
Hi all
I am having no end of trouble getting a basic Active Active Cluster
working. at the moment it is in test / proof of concept and has manual
fencing in place but I cannot for the life of me get the 2 nodes to
join to the one cluster (they both report joined in crm_tool status
but only to a lo
12 matches
Mail list logo
