insight.
-Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com
> [mailto:linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com]
> On Behalf Of Adam Drew
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 2:18 PM
> To: linux clustering
> Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS block size
>
> I
"linux clustering"
Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2011 1:42:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS block size
I also experimented 1k block size on GFS1. Although you can improve
the disk usage using a smaller block size, typically it is recommended
to use the block size same as the page s
I also experimented 1k block size on GFS1. Although you can improve
the disk usage using a smaller block size, typically it is recommended
to use the block size same as the page size, which is 4k in Linux.
I don't remember all the details of results. However, for large files,
the overall performan
One of our GFS filesystems tends to have a large number of very small
files, on average about 1000 bytes each.
I realized this week we'd created our filesystems with default options.
As an experiment on a test system, I've recreated a GFS filesystem with
"-b 1024" to reduce overall disk usage a
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:09 +0200, Mikołaj Radzewicz wrote:
> Hello again,
> I'm planning to run GFS cluster of two nodes on some SAN storage over
> fabric - 4TB ( 5 disk in RAID 5 - with stripe 128k). I'm having some
> mixed feelings about setting the GFS block size for my fs...
>
> The node
Hello again,
I'm planning to run GFS cluster of two nodes on some SAN storage over
fabric - 4TB ( 5 disk in RAID 5 - with stripe 128k). I'm having some
mixed feelings about setting the GFS block size for my fs...
The nodes are going to hold some WWW files (let say for video streaming)
which can be
