On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 03:57 +, Jankowski, Chris wrote:
> Lon,
>
> Thank you for your suggestions.
>
> 1.
> I like very much your idea of having additional fencing agent (called as the
> first one in the chain) with delay dependent on the presence of the service
> on the node. I understand
n Behalf Of Lon Hohberger
Sent: Thursday, 9 December 2010 07:33
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Heuristics for quorum disk used as a tiebreaker in
a two node cluster.
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:10 +, Jankowski, Chris wrote:
> This is exactly what I would like to achieve. I know w
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:10 +, Jankowski, Chris wrote:
> This is exactly what I would like to achieve. I know which node
> should stay alive - the one running my service, and it is trivial for
> me to find this out directly, as I can query for its status locally on
> a node. I do not have use
Hi,
I am configuring a two node HA cluster that has only one service.
The sole purpose of the cluster is to keep the service up with minimum
disruption for the widest possible range of failure scenarios.
I configured a quorum disk to make sure that after a failure of a node, the
cluster (now co
