Re: [Linux-cluster] IP Resource behavior with Red Hat Cluster

2010-12-26 Thread Parvez Shaikh
Hi all Issue has been resolved. After debugging a bit I found that link to eth was not detected - "ethtool ethX | grep "Link detected:" | awk '{print $3}'" Output - no After resolving around this, I could get my IP resource up. Thank you for your kind suggestions and interest in this problem

Re: [Linux-cluster] IP Resource behavior with Red Hat Cluster

2010-12-26 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetinds, On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Parvez Shaikh wrote: > Hi > > > Dec 27 17:35:32 datablade1 clurgmgrd[31853]: Error storing ip: Duplicate > Dec 27 17:36:55 datablade1 clurgmgrd[31853]: Starting > disabled service service:service1 > Dec 27 17:36:55 datablade1 clurgmgrd[31853]: start

Re: [Linux-cluster] IP Resource behavior with Red Hat Cluster

2010-12-26 Thread Parvez Shaikh
Hi I chose my IP resource as 192.168.13.15, I had eth3 configured on 192.168.13.1 but it still failed with error - Dec 27 17:35:32 datablade1 clurgmgrd[31853]: Error storing ip: Duplicate Dec 27 17:36:55 datablade1 clurgmgrd[31853]: Starting disabled service service:service1 Dec 27 17:36:55 dat

Re: [Linux-cluster] IP Resource behavior with Red Hat Cluster

2010-12-24 Thread Parvez Shaikh
Thanks a ton Jakov. It has clarified my doubts. Yours gratefully, Parvez On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Jakov Sosic wrote: > On 12/24/2010 05:46 PM, Parvez Shaikh wrote: >> Hi Jakov >> >> Thank you for your response. My two hosts have multiple network >> interfaces or ethernet cards. I underst

Re: [Linux-cluster] IP Resource behavior with Red Hat Cluster

2010-12-24 Thread Jakov Sosic
On 12/24/2010 05:46 PM, Parvez Shaikh wrote: > Hi Jakov > > Thank you for your response. My two hosts have multiple network > interfaces or ethernet cards. I understood from your email, that the > IP corresponding to "cluster node name" for both hosts, should be in > the same subnet before a clust

Re: [Linux-cluster] IP Resource behavior with Red Hat Cluster

2010-12-24 Thread Parvez Shaikh
Hi Jakov Thank you for your response. My two hosts have multiple network interfaces or ethernet cards. I understood from your email, that the IP corresponding to "cluster node name" for both hosts, should be in the same subnet before a cluster could bring virtual IP up. I will reconfirm if these a

Re: [Linux-cluster] IP Resource behavior with Red Hat Cluster

2010-12-24 Thread Jakov Sosic
On 12/24/2010 09:41 AM, Parvez Shaikh wrote: > Hi Rajagopal, > > Thank you for your response > > I have created a cluster configuration by adding IP resource with > value 192.168.25.153 (some value) and created a service which just has > IP resource part of it. I have set all requisite configurat

Re: [Linux-cluster] IP Resource behavior with Red Hat Cluster

2010-12-24 Thread Parvez Shaikh
Hi Rajagopal, Thank you for your response I have created a cluster configuration by adding IP resource with value 192.168.25.153 (some value) and created a service which just has IP resource part of it. I have set all requisite configuration such two node, node names, failover,fencing etc. Upon

Re: [Linux-cluster] IP Resource behavior with Red Hat Cluster

2010-12-23 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Parvez Shaikh wrote: > Hi all, > > I manually made this virtual IP available on host and then started > service it worked - > Can you please elaborate? did you try to assign IP to the ethx devices and then ping? > clurgmgrd: [31853]: 192.168.25.135 a

[Linux-cluster] IP Resource behavior with Red Hat Cluster

2010-12-23 Thread Parvez Shaikh
Hi all, I am using Red Hat cluster 6.2.0 (version shown with cman_tool version) on Red Hat 5.5 I am on host that has multiple network interfaces and all(or some) of which may be active while I tried to bring up my IP resource up. My cluster is of simple configuration - It has only 2 nodes, and s

Re: [Linux-cluster] IP resource behavior

2008-07-02 Thread Lon Hohberger
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 12:57 -0600, Jeremy Lyon wrote: > Hi, > > We noticed today that if we manually remove an IP via ip a del /32 > dev bond0 that the service does not detect this and does not cause a > fail over. Shouldn't the service be statusing the IP resource to make > sure it is configured

[Linux-cluster] IP resource behavior

2008-07-01 Thread Jeremy Lyon
Hi, We noticed today that if we manually remove an IP via ip a del /32 dev bond0 that the service does not detect this and does not cause a fail over. Shouldn't the service be statusing the IP resource to make sure it is configured and up? We do have the monitor link option enabled. This is clus