Re: [Linux-cluster] Redhat Lists Question

2009-06-10 Thread Gordan Bobic
Tom Lanyon wrote: Posting it to the Red Hat Bugzilla under the approriate component would also help. http://bugzilla.redhat.com It's not a bug fix, it's a feature addition. The bugzilla is for "defects" which, along with bugs, includes requests for enhancements, etc. A quick search of th

Re: [Linux-cluster] Redhat Lists Question

2009-06-10 Thread Tom Lanyon
On 10/06/2009, at 5:57 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: Subhendu Ghosh wrote: Posting it to the Red Hat Bugzilla under the approriate component would also help. http://bugzilla.redhat.com It's not a bug fix, it's a feature addition. The bugzilla is for "defects" which, along with bugs, includes

Re: [Linux-cluster] Redhat Lists Question

2009-06-10 Thread Gordan Bobic
Subhendu Ghosh wrote: Ideally, you want to post the patch to the upstream component. Thanks for responding. It's mostly an initscript patch that checks if for file systems mounted on tmpfs (e.g. if we put /var/lock, /var/run or similar there to save hitting the disk) and saves and restores s

Re: [Linux-cluster] Redhat Lists Question

2009-06-09 Thread Subhendu Ghosh
Gordan Bobic wrote: > Sorry, not related to clustering, but can anybody point me at the best > Redhat list to post suggested patches to? I just wrote a (RHEL5 > specific) patch aimed at laptops with (cheap) SSDs that aims to reduce > the number of disk writes and prolong flash life. I looked at the

[Linux-cluster] Redhat Lists Question

2009-06-09 Thread Gordan Bobic
Sorry, not related to clustering, but can anybody point me at the best Redhat list to post suggested patches to? I just wrote a (RHEL5 specific) patch aimed at laptops with (cheap) SSDs that aims to reduce the number of disk writes and prolong flash life. I looked at the list of lists here: h