On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:29:16PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> Fixing a few misc bugs in prng.c:
> - Remove prng_key/prng_iv from prng_context (both kept in tfm ptr)
> - Making _get_more_prng_bytes return meaningful err codes (not just -1/0)
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:32:00PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Bring prng into better alignment with specificaion:
>
> - Convert to using Generic AES 128 bit cipher
> - Convert DT to be a non-shifted counter, increasing counter period
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 03:46:15PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:29:16PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > Fixing a few misc bugs in prng.c:
> > - Remove prng_key/prng_iv from prng_context (both kept in tfm ptr)
> > - Making _get_more_prng_bytes return meaningful err cod
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 03:48:56PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:32:00PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > Bring prng into better alignment with specificaion:
> >
> > - Convert to using Generic AES 128 bit cipher
> > - Convert DT to be a non-shifted counter, increasing c
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:21:46PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> From: Lee Nipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Remove of_node_put calls since there is no corresponding of_node_get.
> This patch prevents an exception when talitos is loaded a 2nd time.
> This sequence: modprobe talitos; rmmod talitos; mod
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:33:45PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
>
> >use GFP_ATOMIC when necessary; use atomic_t when allocating
> >submit_count.
>
> why?
You mean why are atomics required? Yes that is a good question.
Kim?
Cheers,
--
Visit
On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:33:45PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
use GFP_ATOMIC when necessary; use atomic_t when allocating
submit_count.
why?
You mean why are atomics required? Yes that is a goo
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:26:14 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:33:45PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> >>
> >>> use GFP_ATOMIC when necessary; use a
On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:26:14 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:33:45PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
use GFP
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:51:43 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:26:14 -0500
> > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 16
Clean up a few more minor nits in the prng
Now that we use a plain cipher instead of a blkcipher, we don't need an iv
anymore, so remove that parameter from the reset_prng_context function. Make
it instead with a legngth parameter, so that we can treat the key as a blob,
rather than a s
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 14:30 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> diff --git a/crypto/prng.c b/crypto/prng.c
> index 9e2d277..0b1831e 100644
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -313,6 +313,9 @@ int reset_prng_context(struct prng_context *ctx,
>
> prng_key = (key != NULL) ? key : (unsigned char *)DEFAULT_PRNG_
12 matches
Mail list logo
