On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 06:09:31PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
#1 is in 2.6.30-rc now but I don't see #2 pending anywhere.
Thanks for the reminder. I've now added it to cryptodev.
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} herb...@gondor.apana.org.au
Home Page:
* Herbert Xu | 2009-04-21 13:56:13 [+0800]:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:53:31PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
Thanks for the report. This patch should fix the problem.
In fact, padlock-aes shouldn't have been aes-all in the first
place so I'm going to add tihs patch too.
You changed all algos
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:26:45AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
You changed all algos which need fallback to *-all to get them
probed/loaded after the generic algorithm. The same load/fallback/test
pattern exist for the s390 aes for instance. Should it be renamed as
well?
It was
* Herbert Xu | 2009-04-21 18:53:27 [+0800]:
It was already renamed in the original patch. The problem here
is that padlock-aes was incorrectly renamed as it doesn't require
a fallback.
Right, just key computation which is not part of the crypto API.
Cheers,
--
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe
