Re: [PATCH] Support VIA Nano hardware RNG on X86_64 builds

2009-05-14 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:03:45PM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > Fix Kconfig to build via-rng.ko on X86_64 builds, as the VIA Nano > CPU supports x86_64, too. > > Signed-off-by: Harald Welte Also applied. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http

Re: [PATCH] Support VIA Nano hardware RNG

2009-05-14 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:03:41PM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > Support VIA Nano hardware RNG > > The VIA Nano CPU supports the same XSTORE instruction based RNG, > but it lacks the MSR present in earlier CPUs. > > Signed-off-by: Harald Welte Patch applied. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.open

Re: [PATCH] Enable VIA PadLock on x86_64

2009-05-14 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:29:01AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:03:41AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > > [CRYPTO] Support VIA PadLock hardware crypto on x86-64 > > Sorry, I should have read the list archives before posting. > > Please apply the more correct patch from Se

Re: [PATCH] The VIA Hardware RNG driver is for the CPU, not Chipset

2009-05-14 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 02:28:44PM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > This is a cosmetic change, fixing the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() of via-rng.c > > Signed-off-by: Harald Welte Patch applied. Thanks! -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.ap

Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: mark algs allowed in fips mode

2009-05-14 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 12:55:51AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > Set the fips_allowed flag in testmgr.c's alg_test_descs[] for algs > that are allowed to be used when in fips mode. Both patches applied. Thanks Jarod! -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home

Re: [PATCH] crypto: tcrypt: add option to not exit on success

2009-05-14 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 19:45:50 Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:53:16PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > > It would likely need a LOT of polish, and I'm not sure if its at all > > close to what we have (Herbert has?) in mind At the moment, it > > consists of: > > The interfac