On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:53:00PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> I'll look into it.
Oh I see what's going on. It's the switch from chainiv to eseqiv
that created the error. I'll apply your patch.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~}
Home Page: http
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 08:55:00AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> Thanks! Thats definately an oversight. Likely I included it because I was
> implementing it as part of the FIPS effort. The CPRNG definately works fine,
> even if fips is disabled. Although I think the relationship should be
> re
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:39:10PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> Oh I see what's going on. It's the switch from chainiv to eseqiv
> that created the error. I'll apply your patch.
Actually we can't use seqiv on raw counter mode because it cannot
guarantee IV uniqueness. I think reverting to chai
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 09:29:55PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 08:55:00AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> > Thanks! Thats definately an oversight. Likely I included it because I was
> > implementing it as part of the FIPS effort. The CPRNG definately works
> > fine,
> > e
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 21:12 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:39:10PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > Oh I see what's going on. It's the switch from chainiv to eseqiv
> > that created the error. I'll apply your patch.
>
> Actually we can't use seqiv on raw counter mode beca
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 09:01:07AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>
> I see seqiv is used in rfc3686 mode, it means seqiv can not be used on
> raw counter mode but can be used for rfc3686?
Yeah, with rfc3686 a portion of the counter is available for
counting bytes within each request. This allows a seq
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:41:56AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>
> Is there a good way to select a tristate from a bool? The logic is the right
> thing to do above, it just seems the mechanism comes up a bit short
I suppose you could turn FIPS itself into a tristate. As it
should be used in just o
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:05:57AM +0800, Shane Wang wrote:
>
> For the comment
> > This is unnecessary. Please use the standard kernel helpers
> > from asm/byteorder.h (which you get by including linux/kernel.h).
> The current code distinguishes some macro implementations according to
> differen
