On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:42:43PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >
> > Your first patch is correct.
> >
> Thank you for the explanation.
>
> Can I take that to mean that I can add your Acked-by: if/when I resend the
> patch?
>
Sure,
Acked-by: Steff
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:10:48PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> For some reason it doesn't. :-( I've also tried full barriers.
OK, I don't think it worked in the sha1 case either, as on my
i386 here lib/sha1.c ends up using nearly 500 bytes of stack
space.
It appears that the crux of the is
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:21:39PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, devendra.aaru wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > > We declare 'exact' without initializing it and then do:
> > > >
> > > > [.
