On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, James Bottomley wrote:
+static void KDFa(u8 *key, int keylen, const char *label, u8 *u,
+u8 *v, int bytes, u8 *out)
Should this be in lower case? I would rename it as tpm_kdfa().
This one is defined as KDFa() in the standards and it's not TPM
specific
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 02:51 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
I would consider sending first a patch set that would iterate the
existing session stuff to be ready for this i.e. merge in two
iterations (emphasis on the word "consider"). We can probably
