Re: [PATCH] crypto: padlock: fix for non-64byte aligned data

buffers for encryption. I'm returning home on December 11, and hopfeully can do some testing at that time. Is there a list of machines (/proc/cpuinfo) on which the problem has shown up so far? Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte haraldwe...@viatech.comhttp://linux.via.com.tw

Re: [patch 0/3] crypto: padlock-aes: enable on VIA Nano

than thankful if you could rebase and resubmit as requested. If not, please drop me a not so i can put it on my todo list. Acked-by: HaraldWelte haraldwe...@viatech.com -- - Harald Welte haraldwe...@viatech.comhttp://linux.via.com.tw

Re: [patch 0/3] crypto: padlock-aes: enable on VIA Nano

to enable padlock on x86_64 is already in the crypto-dev tree, as far as I know. Interestingly, I have not observed this problem so far, despite running dm-crypt on a nano for quite some time. Cheers, -- - Harald Welte haraldwe...@viatech.comhttp://linux.via.com.tw

Re: [PATCH] The VIA Hardware RNG driver is for the CPU, not Chipset

Hi Arjan, On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:22:01PM +0200, Arjan Koers wrote: Harald Welte wrote: How can multiple RNGs in current dual-processor setups and in the future multicore Nano be handled? That's actually a good question. I'll probably forward that to the CPU division and see what

[RFC] how to auto-load via-rng ?

Random Number Generators (RNG) * (c) Copyright 2003 Red Hat Inc jgar...@redhat.com + * (c) Copyright 2009 Harald Welte lafo...@gnumonks.org * * derived from * @@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ #include linux/kernel.h #include linux/hw_random.h #include linux/delay.h +#include linux/platform_device.h

[PATCH] Enable VIA PadLock on x86_64

Signed-off-by: Harald Welte haraldwe...@viatech.com diff --git a/drivers/crypto/Kconfig b/drivers/crypto/Kconfig index 01afd75..39eedd4 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/crypto/Kconfig @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ if CRYPTO_HW config CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK tristate Support for VIA PadLock

Re: [PATCH] Enable VIA PadLock on x86_64

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:03:41AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: [CRYPTO] Support VIA PadLock hardware crypto on x86-64 Sorry, I should have read the list archives before posting. Please apply the more correct patch from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior as available since March 14 at http://www.mail

[PATCH] Support VIA Nano hardware RNG

Support VIA Nano hardware RNG The VIA Nano CPU supports the same XSTORE instruction based RNG, but it lacks the MSR present in earlier CPUs. Signed-off-by: Harald Welte haraldwe...@viatech.com diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/via-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/via-rng.c index 4e9573c

[PATCH] Support VIA Nano hardware RNG on X86_64 builds

Fix Kconfig to build via-rng.ko on X86_64 builds, as the VIA Nano CPU supports x86_64, too. Signed-off-by: Harald Welte haraldwe...@viatech.com --- drivers/char/hw_random/Kconfig |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/Kconfig b/drivers

Re: [PATCH] The VIA Hardware RNG driver is for the CPU, not Chipset

additional comment/explanation) to this list. The question is: Since according to MAINTAINERS drivers/char/hw_random is orphaned, which route should patches go? Herbert: Do you accept hw_random related patches, or should they go some different route? Regards, -- - Harald Welte haraldwe

Re: PadLock XSHA

point. -- - Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option. (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch