On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:43:07AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 04/29/2015 04:54 PM, mancha security wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:01:19PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 04/29/2015 03:08 PM, mancha security wrote:
...
By the way, has anyone been able to verify that __memory_barrier
Reported-by: Stephan Mueller smuel...@chronox.de
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann dan...@iogearbox.net
Cc: Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu
Cc: Stephan Mueller smuel...@chronox.de
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa han...@stressinduktion.org
Cc: mancha security manc...@zoho.com
Cc: Mark Charlebois charl
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:01:19PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 04/29/2015 03:08 PM, mancha security wrote:
...
By the way, has anyone been able to verify that __memory_barrier
provides DSE protection under various optimizations? Unfortunately, I
don't have ready access to ICC
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Am Freitag, 10. April 2015, 14:22:08 schrieb mancha security:
Hi mancha,
__asm__ __volatile__(: :r(p) :memory)
gcc -O2/3: mov present
clang -O2/3: mov present
== approach would be good too.
Note, the assembly code