On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:29:01AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:03:41AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote:
> > [CRYPTO] Support VIA PadLock hardware crypto on x86-64
>
> Sorry, I should have read the list archives before posting.
>
> Please apply the more correct patch from Se
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:03:41AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote:
> [CRYPTO] Support VIA PadLock hardware crypto on x86-64
Sorry, I should have read the list archives before posting.
Please apply the more correct patch from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
as available since March 14 at
http://www.mail-arc
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:03:41AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote:
> [CRYPTO] Support VIA PadLock hardware crypto on x86-64
>
> The VIA Nano CPU supports x86_64, so it is now wrong to assume PadLock
> would only exist on X86_32 builds.
>
> This patch just alters Kconfig to reflect this fact, as well
[CRYPTO] Support VIA PadLock hardware crypto on x86-64
The VIA Nano CPU supports x86_64, so it is now wrong to assume PadLock
would only exist on X86_32 builds.
This patch just alters Kconfig to reflect this fact, as well as a trivial
one-line fix to an assembly statement in padlock-aes.c
Signe