Re: [PATCH] Enable VIA PadLock on x86_64

2009-05-14 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:29:01AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:03:41AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > > [CRYPTO] Support VIA PadLock hardware crypto on x86-64 > > Sorry, I should have read the list archives before posting. > > Please apply the more correct patch from Se

Re: [PATCH] Enable VIA PadLock on x86_64

2009-05-10 Thread Harald Welte
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:03:41AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > [CRYPTO] Support VIA PadLock hardware crypto on x86-64 Sorry, I should have read the list archives before posting. Please apply the more correct patch from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior as available since March 14 at http://www.mail-arc

Re: [PATCH] Enable VIA PadLock on x86_64

2009-05-10 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:03:41AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > [CRYPTO] Support VIA PadLock hardware crypto on x86-64 > > The VIA Nano CPU supports x86_64, so it is now wrong to assume PadLock > would only exist on X86_32 builds. > > This patch just alters Kconfig to reflect this fact, as well

[PATCH] Enable VIA PadLock on x86_64

2009-05-10 Thread Harald Welte
[CRYPTO] Support VIA PadLock hardware crypto on x86-64 The VIA Nano CPU supports x86_64, so it is now wrong to assume PadLock would only exist on X86_32 builds. This patch just alters Kconfig to reflect this fact, as well as a trivial one-line fix to an assembly statement in padlock-aes.c Signe