Re: [PATCH 0/3] padata: cpumasks

2010-07-19 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 02:29:51PM +0400, Dan Kruchinin wrote: This is my third attempt to send padata cpumasks patchset. The patchset includes fixes of all unclear things Steffen noted in previous two patchsets. Changes: 1) Make two cpumasks in padata instead of one. The first cpumask is

Re: [PATCH 0/3] padata: cpumasks

2010-07-19 Thread Steffen Klassert
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 02:04:26PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: All applied. Thanks! Hm, I was just about to write some comments on these patches, they still have some issues. For example, handling empty cpumasks is broken again (NULL pointer dereference in padata_replace). The cpu_index is zero

Re: [PATCH 0/3] padata: cpumasks

2010-07-19 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:40:50AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 02:04:26PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: All applied. Thanks! Hm, I was just about to write some comments on these patches, they still have some issues. For example, handling empty cpumasks is broken

[PATCH 0/3] padata: cpumasks

2010-07-14 Thread Dan Kruchinin
This is my third attempt to send padata cpumasks patchset. The patchset includes fixes of all unclear things Steffen noted in previous two patchsets. Changes: 1) Make two cpumasks in padata instead of one. The first cpumask is used by parallel workers and another is used by the workers doing