On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 04:04:01AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 1:34 AM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > I see this BUG_ON() is still here. It really needs to be removed. It
> > does not look like you need to crash the kernel here. Can you add in a
> > test of l
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 1:34 AM Andrew Lunn wrote:
> I see this BUG_ON() is still here. It really needs to be removed. It
> does not look like you need to crash the kernel here. Can you add in a
> test of len >= 128, do a WARN and then return. I think you then leak
> some memory, but i
> +#define push_rcu(stack, p, len) ({
> \
> + if (rcu_access_pointer(p)) { \
> + BUG_ON(len >= 128);\
> + stack[len++] = rcu_derefer
