Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: doc - clarify hash callbacks state machine

2018-03-30 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 09:56:12AM +0200, Horia Geantă wrote: > Add a note that it is perfectly legal to "abandon" a request object: > - call .init() and then (as many times) .update() > - _not_ call any of .final(), .finup() or .export() at any point in > future > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.or

Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: doc - clarify hash callbacks state machine

2018-03-20 Thread Horia Geantă
On 3/20/2018 10:50 AM, Kamil Konieczny wrote: > On 20.03.2018 08:56, Horia Geantă wrote: >> Add a note that it is perfectly legal to "abandon" a request object: >> - call .init() and then (as many times) .update() >> - _not_ call any of .final(), .finup() or .export() at any point in >> future >>

Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: doc - clarify hash callbacks state machine

2018-03-20 Thread Kamil Konieczny
On 20.03.2018 08:56, Horia Geantă wrote: > Add a note that it is perfectly legal to "abandon" a request object: > - call .init() and then (as many times) .update() > - _not_ call any of .final(), .finup() or .export() at any point in > future > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180222114741.

[PATCH v2] crypto: doc - clarify hash callbacks state machine

2018-03-20 Thread Horia Geantă
Add a note that it is perfectly legal to "abandon" a request object: - call .init() and then (as many times) .update() - _not_ call any of .final(), .finup() or .export() at any point in future Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180222114741.ga27...@gondor.apana.org.au Signed-off-by: Horia Geantă