On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:00:03PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> Sure, maybe I could take some of your code as is. My plan for
> hmac is to first convert it to shash, then convert the users to
> ahash, and finally convert hmac itself to ahash.
>
> This way we don't have to convert all the users a
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:00:15AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>
> Just FYI, I have a ahash version of hmac. Actually I'm about to convert
> the hmac users. I have not posted it so far because not all hmac users
> are converted, but I can do so if you are interested.
Sure, maybe I could take so
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:03:41PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:02:32PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > Actually I'll do the remaining DIGEST algorithms right now because
> > without them hmac can't be converted.
>
> Nevermind, there aren't any remaining DIGEST algorithms
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 12:03 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:02:32PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > Actually I'll do the remaining DIGEST algorithms right now because
> > without them hmac can't be converted.
>
> Nevermind, there aren't any remaining DIGEST algorithms :)
>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:02:32PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> Actually I'll do the remaining DIGEST algorithms right now because
> without them hmac can't be converted.
Nevermind, there aren't any remaining DIGEST algorithms :)
I'll get onto hmac.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.opens
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:45:48AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> I'll try to get onto hmac today or tomorrow. But if you could
> spend some time on the remaining DIGEST algorithms that would
> very much be appreciated.
Actually I'll do the remaining DIGEST algorithms right now because
without the
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:31:52AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>
> What's your plan to convert everything to shash? For 2.6.32? How about
> the progress? What can I do to help?
I've been busy with networking :)
I'll try to get onto hmac today or tomorrow. But if you could
spend some time on the rem
Hi, Herbert,
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 21:51 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Huang Ying wrote:
> > PCLMULQDQ is used to accelerate the most time-consuming part of GHASH,
> > carry-less multiplication. More information about PCLMULQDQ can be
> > found at:
> >
> > http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/c
Huang Ying wrote:
> PCLMULQDQ is used to accelerate the most time-consuming part of GHASH,
> carry-less multiplication. More information about PCLMULQDQ can be
> found at:
>
> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/carry-less-multiplication-and-its-usage-for-computing-the-gcm-mode/
>
> Because
PCLMULQDQ is used to accelerate the most time-consuming part of GHASH,
carry-less multiplication. More information about PCLMULQDQ can be
found at:
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/carry-less-multiplication-and-its-usage-for-computing-the-gcm-mode/
Because PCLMULQDQ changes XMM state, its
10 matches
Mail list logo
