Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] kconfig: add as-instr macro to scripts/Kconfig.include

2018-11-07 Thread Vladimir Murzin
On 07/11/18 14:55, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 09:40:05AM +, Vladimir Murzin wrote: >> There are cases where the whole feature, for instance arm64/lse or >> arm/crypto, can depend on assembler. Current practice is to report >> buildtime that selected feature is not supported,

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] kconfig: add as-instr macro to scripts/Kconfig.include

2018-11-07 Thread Will Deacon
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 09:40:05AM +, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > There are cases where the whole feature, for instance arm64/lse or > arm/crypto, can depend on assembler. Current practice is to report > buildtime that selected feature is not supported, which can be quite > annoying... Why is it

[RFC PATCH 1/4] kconfig: add as-instr macro to scripts/Kconfig.include

2018-11-07 Thread Vladimir Murzin
There are cases where the whole feature, for instance arm64/lse or arm/crypto, can depend on assembler. Current practice is to report buildtime that selected feature is not supported, which can be quite annoying... It'd nicer if we can check assembler first and opt-in feature visibility in