Re: Bug#552270: Marvell CESA driver and Kirkwood

2010-04-30 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Uri Simchoni | 2010-04-24 21:43:35 [+0300]: Sorry for the late reply. >> I enabled list and sg debugging and a flood ping triggered a couple of >> warning. Could you please look at this? >Sure. It seems that everything is working now. >> IPsec requests authenc(hmac(sha1),cbc(aes)) so right now

Re: Bug#552270: Marvell CESA driver and Kirkwood

2010-04-24 Thread Uri Simchoni
On 4/24/2010 6:12 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Uri Simchoni | 2010-04-22 06:23:12 [+0300]: > > For IPSec I use this[0] shell script which sets up a connection. Good for > testing :) Thanks, That'll save time setting it up... > I enabled list and sg debugging and a flood ping triggered

Re: Bug#552270: Marvell CESA driver and Kirkwood

2010-04-24 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2010-04-24 17:12:07 [+0200]: >For IPSec I use this[0] shell script which sets up a connection. Good for [0] http://breakpoint.cc/ipsec.sh Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.k

Re: Bug#552270: Marvell CESA driver and Kirkwood

2010-04-24 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Uri Simchoni | 2010-04-22 06:23:12 [+0300]: >I have some IPSec background but am not familiar with the Linux implementation >(I'm using the mv_cesa for SSL acceleration through a usermode interface I'm >working on). Can you point me to the nearest howto? I suppose I could have a >look. If it

Re: Bug#552270: Marvell CESA driver and Kirkwood

2010-04-21 Thread Uri Simchoni
I have some IPSec background but am not familiar with the Linux implementation (I'm using the mv_cesa for SSL acceleration through a usermode interface I'm working on). Can you point me to the nearest howto? I suppose I could have a look. Thanks, Uri. On 4/21/2010 11:13 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Si

Re: Bug#552270: Marvell CESA driver and Kirkwood

2010-04-21 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* L.C. | 2010-04-20 22:45:19 [+0200]: >Sebastian, here is the OOPS from the latest cryptodev git tree >(2.6.33), more clue than I thought, it looks?: No I don't. I look at it this weekend. I need just to setup IPsec in order to reproduce this, right? >cut >fli