Hi!
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Lucas De Marchi writes:
>> Hi!
>>
>> CC'ing Rusty and mailing lists
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Rusty and ohers: it looks like both CONFIG_CRC32 and
>> CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32 can be compiled as module, and they generate
>> modules with the same name,
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Lucas De Marchi writes:
>> Hi!
>>
>> CC'ing Rusty and mailing lists
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Rusty and ohers: it looks like both CONFIG_CRC32 and
>> CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32 can be compiled as module, and they generate
>> modules with the same name, crc3
Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> I think we could rename it to crypto_crc32, but I don't think it's the
> only one. Marco, I think depmod should probably FAIL if two modules
> have the same name, which would at least find such problems.
This patch renames it to crc32_generic.
---8<---
Subject: crypto:
On 29/01/16 07:54, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Lucas De Marchi writes:
>> Hi!
>>
>> CC'ing Rusty and mailing lists
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Rusty and ohers: it looks like both CONFIG_CRC32 and
>> CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32 can be compiled as module, and they generate
>> modules with the same name, crc32. Could th
Lucas De Marchi writes:
> Hi!
>
> CC'ing Rusty and mailing lists
Thanks.
> Rusty and ohers: it looks like both CONFIG_CRC32 and
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32 can be compiled as module, and they generate
> modules with the same name, crc32. Could that be fixed?
Gah. Looks like it's been that way since