On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:30:21AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> Andrew, I'll just back this out if it doesn't get resolved.
Andrew, the problem should be resolved in the current cryptodev
tree. Please let me know if it still blows up for you.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu
Home Page: http://gond
...@gondor.apana.org.au]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 1:30 AM
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Struk, Tadeusz; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org;
O Mahony, Aidan; Paoloni, Gabriele; Hoban, Adrian
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] RFC4106 AES-GCM Driver Using Intel New Instructions
On Thu
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 04:14:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > Tadeusz, could you please make an incremental patch that converts
> > > all the pshufb instructions to macros?
> > >
> >
> > Will do.
> > Tadeusz
> >
>
> (top-posting repaired)
>
> (busted attribution/quoting repaired)
>
>
..@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; O Mahony, Aidan; Paoloni, Gabriele; Hoban,
> > Adrian
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] RFC4106 AES-GCM Driver Using Intel New Instructions
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 05:23:31PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
: Re: [PATCH 2/3] RFC4106 AES-GCM Driver Using Intel New Instructions
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 05:23:31PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:04:05 -0500
> Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:19:09PM +0100, tadeusz.st...@intel.com wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 05:23:31PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:04:05 -0500
> Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:19:09PM +0100, tadeusz.st...@intel.com wrote:
> > > Hi Herbert,
> > >We have reworked the assembly to use macros instead of the new aesni
>
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:04:05 -0500
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:19:09PM +0100, tadeusz.st...@intel.com wrote:
> > Hi Herbert,
> >We have reworked the assembly to use macros instead of the new aesni
> > instructions.
>
> Both applied. Thanks for your efforts!
Whatever's in
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:19:09PM +0100, tadeusz.st...@intel.com wrote:
> Hi Herbert,
>We have reworked the assembly to use macros instead of the new aesni
> instructions.
Both applied. Thanks for your efforts!
>Do you think it is possible to get it in into 2.6.37?
Sorry, it needed to
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:49:10AM +0100, Hoban, Adrian wrote:
> Hi Herbert,
>
> We have been using binutils v2.19.
>
> Can you please recommend the version(s) of binutils (gas) that we should test
> with before submitting a patch? V2.16.1, or perhaps the older version (2.12)
> described in /D
; Hoban, Adrian
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] RFC4106 AES-GCM Driver Using Intel New Instructions
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:31:41AM +0100, tadeusz.st...@intel.com wrote:
> Hi Herbert,
> Resubmitting the two other patches as requested.
> Thanks,
> Tadeus
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:31:41AM +0100, tadeusz.st...@intel.com wrote:
> Hi Herbert,
> Resubmitting the two other patches as requested.
> Thanks,
> Tadeusz
>
> >From 06444d8a95458d807ae14699e557739281d0b026 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Adrian Hoban
> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:08:45 +0100
>
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:21:54PM +0100, Struk, Tadeusz wrote:
> Hello Herbert,
> I've reworked the patch 2/3 and successfully applied all of them.
> The problem was spaces at EOL.
> Please find the reworked patch below.
>
> >From 06444d8a95458d807ae14699e557739281d0b026 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 06:36:24PM +0100, Hoban, Adrian wrote:
> This patch adds an optimized RFC4106 AES-GCM implementation for 64-bit
> kernels. It supports 128-bit AES key size. This leverages the crypto
> AEAD interface type to facilitate a combined AES & GCM operation to
> be implemented in as
13 matches
Mail list logo
