On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:44:17AM +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
> Hi Herbert,
>
> On 6 November 2017 at 12:39, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:57:21AM +, Jim Quigley wrote:
> >> moved the call to hwrng_register() out of the probe routine into the scan
> >> routine
Hi Herbert,
On 6 November 2017 at 12:39, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:57:21AM +, Jim Quigley wrote:
>> moved the call to hwrng_register() out of the probe routine into the scan
>> routine. We need to call hwrng_register() after a suspend/restore cycle
>> to re-register the d
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:57:21AM +, Jim Quigley wrote:
> The patch for
>
> commit: 5c06273401f2eb7b290cadbae18ee00f8f65e893
> Author: Amit Shah
> Date: Sun Jul 27 07:34:01 2014 +0930
>
> virtio: rng: delay hwrng_register() till driver is ready
>
> moved the call to hwrng_register()
Jim,
Minor comment below.
On 3 November 2017 at 15:27, Jim Quigley wrote:
> The patch for
>
> commit: 5c06273401f2eb7b290cadbae18ee00f8f65e893
> Author: Amit Shah
> Date: Sun Jul 27 07:34:01 2014 +0930
>
> virtio: rng: delay hwrng_register() till driver is ready
>
> moved the call to hwrn
Hi Jim,
Have second thoughts on this.
On 3 November 2017 at 20:55, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
wrote:
>>
>> It would be cleaner to just get rid of probe_common() altogether in that
>> case, and do whatever
>> needs to be done in virtrng_probe()/virtrng_restore() respectively, but
>
> That
On 03/11/2017 13:06, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
Hi Jim,
On 3 November 2017 at 15:27, Jim Quigley wrote:
The patch for
commit: 5c06273401f2eb7b290cadbae18ee00f8f65e893
Author: Amit Shah
Date: Sun Jul 27 07:34:01 2014 +0930
virtio: rng: delay hwrng_register() till driver is re
Hi Jim,
On 3 November 2017 at 15:27, Jim Quigley wrote:
> The patch for
>
> commit: 5c06273401f2eb7b290cadbae18ee00f8f65e893
> Author: Amit Shah
> Date: Sun Jul 27 07:34:01 2014 +0930
>
> virtio: rng: delay hwrng_register() till driver is ready
>
> moved the call to hwrng_register() out of
