Hi,
On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 23:25 -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
one of the more important details in evaluating these changes would be the
family/model/stepping of the processors being microbenchmarked... could
you folks include /proc/cpuinfo with the results?
The file attached is /proc/cpuinfo
Hi, Sebastian,
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 00:12 +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
* Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]:
Hi, Sebastian,
Hi Huang,
sorry for the delay.
I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of
interleaving. Can you help me to test these new
one of the more important details in evaluating these changes would be the
family/model/stepping of the processors being microbenchmarked... could
you folks include /proc/cpuinfo with the results?
also -- please drop the #define for R16 to %rsp ... it obfuscates more
than it helps anything.
* Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]:
Hi, Sebastian,
Hi Huang,
sorry for the delay.
I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of
interleaving. Can you help me to test these new patches? The new patches
is attached with the mail.
The new results are attached.
