Re: [linux-distros-dev] Final 0.1 testing

2009-01-20 Thread Andrew Overholt
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:52 -0500, Elliott Baron wrote: > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=261558 > I feel this is an important fix to make it into 0.1 Okay, as soon as that's fixed, I'll re-spin a build with it being the old change. Then I'll do a quick test to verify the update sit

Re: [linux-distros-dev] Final 0.1 testing

2009-01-20 Thread Elliott Baron
I discovered a new bug with multi-process profiling using Massif that I'll have fixed by the end of the day. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=261558 I feel this is an important fix to make it into 0.1 Kent Sebastian wrote: - Original Message - Please respond here when yo

Re: [linux-distros-dev] Final 0.1 testing

2009-01-20 Thread Andrew Overholt
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:33 -0500, Kent Sebastian wrote: > - Original Message - > > > Please respond here when you're satisfied with the release update site. > Once everyone's signed off, I'll email the Eclipse people to get the > release review scheduled. In the mean time, keep up the g

Re: [linux-distros-dev] Final 0.1 testing

2009-01-20 Thread Andrew Overholt
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 15:32 +, Phil Muldoon wrote: > Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > > Please respond here when you're satisfied with the release update site. > > Once everyone's signed off, I'll email the Eclipse people to get the > > release review scheduled. In the mean time, keep up the good

Re: [linux-distros-dev] Final 0.1 testing

2009-01-20 Thread Kent Sebastian
- Original Message - Please respond here when you're satisfied with the release update site. Once everyone's signed off, I'll email the Eclipse people to get the release review scheduled. In the mean time, keep up the good work towards 0.2! OProfile is good to go for 0.1. -Kent ___

Re: [linux-distros-dev] Final 0.1 testing

2009-01-20 Thread Phil Muldoon
Andrew Overholt wrote: Please respond here when you're satisfied with the release update site. Once everyone's signed off, I'll email the Eclipse people to get the release review scheduled. In the mean time, keep up the good work towards 0.2! I tested the ChangeLog and System Tap functionali

Re: [linux-distros-dev] Final 0.1 testing

2009-01-20 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Alexander Kurtakov [2009-01-20 05:01]: > After almost hour testing of specfile editor and rpmstubby I didn't find > anything critical that should delay the release. > Good to go :) Awesome, thanks! Andrew ___ linux-distros-dev mailing list linux-d

Re: [linux-distros-dev] Final 0.1 testing

2009-01-20 Thread Alexander Kurtakov
After almost hour testing of specfile editor and rpmstubby I didn't find anything critical that should delay the release. Good to go :) Alex Andrew Overholt wrote: Hi, One last minute bug fix was committed and I re-spun a build. Please test -- with a clean eclipse.org download -- this updat

Re: [linux-distros-dev] Final 0.1 testing

2009-01-19 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi, * Jeff Johnston [2009-01-19 19:29]: > I'm happy with my testing of Autotools, ChangeLog, and LibHover but I > discovered two bugs. Okay. I assume installation was okay, though? > First of all, I found a bug in the ammacros 1.4-p6 xml document that > caused a NPE but this file is store

Re: [linux-distros-dev] Final 0.1 testing

2009-01-19 Thread Jeff Johnston
I'm happy with my testing of Autotools, ChangeLog, and LibHover but I discovered two bugs. First of all, I found a bug in the ammacros 1.4-p6 xml document that caused a NPE but this file is stored off-site on sourceware.org and I corrected it there. The ChangeLog plugin also has a bug whereb

[linux-distros-dev] Final 0.1 testing

2009-01-19 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi, One last minute bug fix was committed and I re-spun a build. Please test -- with a clean eclipse.org download -- this update site which will be the one we announce on release day: http://download.eclipse.org/technology/linuxtools/update If there are any bugs that you feel are worth not ship