[PATCH] Documentation: Fix some grammar mistakes in sync_file.txt

2016-05-13 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
There are two sentences in the Sync File documentation where the english is a little off. This patch is an attempt to fix these. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas --- Documentation/sync_file.txt | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/sync_

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Intel Secure Guard Extensions

2016-05-13 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On May 13, 2016 2:42 AM, "Dr. Greg Wettstein" wrote: > > On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 06:32:10PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Good morning, running behind on e-mail this week but wanted to get > some reflections out on Andy's well taken comments and concerns. > > > On May 8, 2016 2:59 AM, "Dr. Gre

Re: [RFC6 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64

2016-05-13 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:28:03AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > >On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:20:00AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > > >>I debugged preadv02 and pwritev02 failures and found very weird bug. > > >>Test passes {iovec_base = 0x, iovec_len = 64} as one element > > >>>

Re: [RFC6 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64

2016-05-13 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:51:15PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:28:03AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > The discussion is mainly around whether USER_DS for 32-bit compat apps > > should be the same as USER_DS for native 32-bit apps. Even for native > > 32-bit kernels, we

Re: [RFC6 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64

2016-05-13 Thread Yury Norov
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:28:03AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > The discussion is mainly around whether USER_DS for 32-bit compat apps > should be the same as USER_DS for native 32-bit apps. Even for native > 32-bit kernels, we don't use STACK_TOP as addr_limit. A read/write from > 0x

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Intel Secure Guard Extensions

2016-05-13 Thread Dr. Greg Wettstein
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 06:32:10PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: Good morning, running behind on e-mail this week but wanted to get some reflections out on Andy's well taken comments and concerns. > On May 8, 2016 2:59 AM, "Dr. Greg Wettstein" wrote: > > > > > > This now means the security of SG

Re: [RFC6 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64

2016-05-13 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 04:11:23PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote: > On 2016/5/12 23:28, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 05:24:57PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > >>On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:07:35PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >>>On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 04:44:31PM +0300, Yury No

Re: [RFC6 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64

2016-05-13 Thread Zhangjian (Bamvor)
Hi, On 2016/5/12 23:28, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 05:24:57PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:07:35PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 04:44:31PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 02:35:34PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wro