On 09/01/2016 04:36 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
On 09/01/2016 07:25 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 31 August 2016 at 21:00, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 31 August 2016 at 20:23, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Not really as it won'
On Fri, 02 Sep 2016, Eric Holscher wrote:
> This uses the proper Sphinx add_stylesheet API for adding style overrides:
>
> http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/extdev/appapi.html#sphinx.application.Sphinx.add_stylesheet
>
> Previously,
> if a user had any other `css_files` defined by extensions,
>
Mention that arm64 also has kasan support.
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor
---
Documentation/kasan.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/kasan.txt b/Documentation/kasan.txt
index 7dd95b3..c156934 100644
--- a/Documentation/kasan.txt
+++ b/Documentat
This uses the proper Sphinx add_stylesheet API for adding style overrides:
http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/extdev/appapi.html#sphinx.application.Sphinx.add_stylesheet
Previously,
if a user had any other `css_files` defined by extensions,
they would be overwritten by the `html_context` redefin
On 2016-08-31 01:04 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:36:26PM -0400, Robert Foss wrote:
On 2016-08-31 05:45 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
+static void *m_totmaps_start(struct seq_file *p, loff_t *pos)
+{
+return NULL + (*pos == 0);
+}
+
+static void *m_totmaps_next(struct
Am 01.09.2016 um 18:22 schrieb Markus Heiser :
>
> Am 01.09.2016 um 16:29 schrieb Jani Nikula :
>
>> On Thu, 01 Sep 2016, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:35:24 +0200
>>> Markus Heiser wrote:
>>>
With metadata "parallel_read_safe = True" a extension is marked as
sa
Am 01.09.2016 um 16:29 schrieb Jani Nikula :
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2016, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:35:24 +0200
>> Markus Heiser wrote:
>>
>>> With metadata "parallel_read_safe = True" a extension is marked as
>>> save for "parallel reading of source". This is needed if you wa
Hi
On 01/09/16 16:06, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> Mention that arm64 also has kasan support.
It seems that similar patch was already sent before [1]
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/16/566
Vladimir
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor
> ---
> Documentation/kasan.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 i
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 09/01/2016 07:25 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > On 31 August 2016 at 21:00, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> On 31 August 2016 at 20:23, Alan Stern wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Not really as it won't cover some pretty commo
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:35:24 +0200
> Markus Heiser wrote:
>
>> With metadata "parallel_read_safe = True" a extension is marked as
>> save for "parallel reading of source". This is needed if you want
>> build in parallel with N processes. E.g.:
>>
>>
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:35:24 +0200
Markus Heiser wrote:
> With metadata "parallel_read_safe = True" a extension is marked as
> save for "parallel reading of source". This is needed if you want
> build in parallel with N processes. E.g.:
>
> make SPHINXOPTS=-j4 htmldocs
A definite improvement;
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:20:56 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The other two patches better fit on your tree, IMHO.
>
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab (3):
> docs-rst: improve typedef parser
> docs-rst: kernel-doc: fix typedef output in RST format
I've just applied them, thanks.
jon
--
To unsubs
On 01/09/2016 00:16, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 06:07:30PM +0300, Matan Barak wrote:
Currently, there are some discussions regarding the RDMA ABI. The current
proposed approach (after a lot of discussions in the OFVWG) is to have
driver dependent object types rather than th
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:32:16AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 8/30/2016 3:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >What !? I really don't get this, what are you waiting for? Why is
> >rescheduling making things better.
>
> We need to wait for the last dyntick to fire before we can return to
> usersp
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:41:35AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Also provide some pointers for building IGT as some kernel hackers might
> not be that familiar with building stuff on Linux distros.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
Applied to drm-misc, thanks.
-Daniel
> ---
>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:25:40AM +0300, Matan Barak wrote:
> Well, if I recall, the reason doing so last time was in order to allow
> flexible updating of ib_core independently, which is obviously not a good
> reason (to say the least).
>
> Since the new ABI will probably define new object type
Also provide some pointers for building IGT as some kernel hackers might
not be that familiar with building stuff on Linux distros.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso
Cc: Daniel Vetter
---
Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 37 +
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff
On 09/01/2016 07:25 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 31 August 2016 at 21:00, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 31 August 2016 at 20:23, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Not really as it won't cover some pretty common use cases. Many home
routers have few USB ports (2-5) and only
18 matches
Mail list logo