[PATCH resend] VFS: simplify seq_file iteration code and interface

Just resending after 2 weeks silence, in case it fell through a crack. Thanks, NeilBrown ("git am -c" understands this line) --8<- The documentation for seq_file suggests that it is necessary to be able to move the iterator to a given offset, however that is not the

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 12:15:11PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 29 April 2018 at 07:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:25:17PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> Due to some maintainers *preferring* BSD-compatible license for DTS > >>

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Add the I3C subsystem

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 07:56:46PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 07:38:14PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 09:47:41 +0200 > > Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > This patch series is a proposal for a new

Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] i3c: Add sysfs ABI spec

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:47:44AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Document sysfs files/directories/symlinks exposed by the I3C subsystem. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > --- > Changes in v2: > - new patch > --- > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-i3c | 95 >

Re: [PATCH v6 8/8] ipc: Conserve sequence numbers in extended IPCMNI mode

/commits/Waiman-Long/ipc-Clamp-mni-to-the-real-IPCMNI-limit-increase-that-limit/20180429-175431 config: m68k-stmark2_defconfig (attached as .config) compiler: m68k-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0 reproduce: wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross

Re: [PATCH v6 7/8] ipc: Allow boot time extension of IPCMNI from 32k to 2M

/commits/Waiman-Long/ipc-Clamp-mni-to-the-real-IPCMNI-limit-increase-that-limit/20180429-175431 config: m68k-stmark2_defconfig (attached as .config) compiler: m68k-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0 reproduce: wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On 29 April 2018 at 07:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:25:17PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> Due to some maintainers *preferring* BSD-compatible license for DTS >> files [0], I was writing mine using ISC. I had no very special reason >> for

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 07:03:15AM +, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 07:26:17AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > I see it is only used in a very small number of dts files. Why not just > > use BSD-2-Clause instead? What do you find in ISC that is not available > > to

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 07:26:17AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > I see it is only used in a very small number of dts files. Why not just > use BSD-2-Clause instead? What do you find in ISC that is not available > to you with just BSD? ISC license is a simplified version of the BSD license