Re: [PATCH] doc/rcu: Correct field_count field naming in examples

2019-05-11 Thread Andrea Parri
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 05:41:31PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:11:26AM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote: > > Hi Paul, Joel, > > > > > > > On the other hand, would you have ideas for more modern replacement > > > > > examples? > > > > > > > > There are 3 cases I can see in

Re: [PATCH] doc/rcu: Correct field_count field naming in examples

2019-05-11 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:11:26AM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote: > Hi Paul, Joel, > > > > > On the other hand, would you have ideas for more modern replacement > > > > examples? > > > > > > There are 3 cases I can see in listRCU.txt: > > > (1) action taken outside of read_lock (can tolerate stale

Re: [PATCH] doc/rcu: Correct field_count field naming in examples

2019-05-11 Thread Andrea Parri
Hi Paul, Joel, > > > On the other hand, would you have ideas for more modern replacement > > > examples? > > > > There are 3 cases I can see in listRCU.txt: > > (1) action taken outside of read_lock (can tolerate stale data), no > > in-place update. > > this is the best possibl

Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework

2019-05-11 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:12:40PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: > However, the reply is incorrect. Kselftest in-kernel tests (which > is the context here) can be configured as built in instead of as > a module, and built in a UML kernel. The UML kernel can boot, > running the in-kernel tests before

Re: [PATCH 3/3] kheaders: Make it depend on sysfs

2019-05-11 Thread Joel Fernandes
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 08:02:03AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 09:52:04AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 6:05 AM Joel Fernandes (Google) > > wrote: > > > > > > The kheaders archive is exposed through SYSFS in /sys/kernel/. Make it > > > dep