On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:33 AM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:16:39AM +, David Howells wrote:
>> SeongJae Park wrote:
>>
>> > From f7b5677790771599f418f1d95536935be971ae86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: SeongJae Park
>> > Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:26:18 +0900
>>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:16:39AM +, David Howells wrote:
> SeongJae Park wrote:
>
> > From f7b5677790771599f418f1d95536935be971ae86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: SeongJae Park
> > Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:26:18 +0900
> > Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/memory-barriers: polish compiler
SeongJae Park wrote:
> From f7b5677790771599f418f1d95536935be971ae86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: SeongJae Park
> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:26:18 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/memory-barriers: polish compiler store omit
> example
>
> Comments of examples about compiler store omit
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, David Howells wrote:
SeongJae Park wrote:
a = 0;
/* Code that does not store to variable a. */
+ does_not_change_a();
a = 0;
Since it's not actually code that's meant to be executed, you could make it:
a = 0;
... code that does not store to vari
SeongJae Park wrote:
> a = 0;
> /* Code that does not store to variable a. */
> + does_not_change_a();
> a = 0;
Since it's not actually code that's meant to be executed, you could make it:
a = 0;
... code that does not store to variable a ...
a = 0;
David
--
To un
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 07:50:19AM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 03:01:08PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> >> There is wrong comment in example for compiler store omit behavior. It
> >> shows example of the prob
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 07:50:19AM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Paul E. McKenney
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 03:01:08PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
>> >> There is wrong comment in example for
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 03:01:08PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
>> There is wrong comment in example for compiler store omit behavior. It
>> shows example of the problem and than problem solved version code.
>> However, the comment in the
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 03:01:08PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> There is wrong comment in example for compiler store omit behavior. It
> shows example of the problem and than problem solved version code.
> However, the comment in the solved version is still same with not solved
> version. Fix th
There is wrong comment in example for compiler store omit behavior. It
shows example of the problem and than problem solved version code.
However, the comment in the solved version is still same with not solved
version. Fix the wrong statement with this commit.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park
---
10 matches
Mail list logo
