On 07/19/2017 02:20 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
[...]
> +void irq_sim_fini(struct irq_sim *sim)
> +{
Not very likely to happen in practice, but for correctness we should
probably put a irq_work_sync() here for each of the IRQs to make sure that
the memory associated with the irq_sim_work_ctx st
2017-07-22 22:59 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Cameron :
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * irq_sim_fire - Enqueue an interrupt.
>> + *
>> + * @sim:The interrupt simulator object.
>> + * @offset: Offset of the simulated interrupt which should be fired.
>> + */
>> +void irq_sim_fire(struct irq_sim *sim, unsigned
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:20:12 +0200
Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Implement a simple, irq_work-based framework for simulating
> interrupts. Currently the API exposes routines for initializing and
> deinitializing the simulator object, enqueueing the interrupts and
> retrieving the allocated interru
Implement a simple, irq_work-based framework for simulating
interrupts. Currently the API exposes routines for initializing and
deinitializing the simulator object, enqueueing the interrupts and
retrieving the allocated interrupt numbers based on the offset of the
dummy interrupt in the simulator s
