On 25/08/17 15:11, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Friday, 25 August 2017 12:40:05 EEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> From: "mche...@s-opensource.com"
>>
>> When we added support for omap3, back in 2010, we added a new
>> type
Hi Mauro,
On Friday, 25 August 2017 16:38:23 EEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:11:15 +0300 Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> > On Friday, 25 August 2017 12:40:05 EEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> From: "mche...@s-opensource.com"
> >>
> >> When
Em Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:11:15 +0300
Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Friday, 25 August 2017 12:40:05 EEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > From: "mche...@s-opensource.com"
> >
> > When we
Hi Mauro,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday, 25 August 2017 12:40:05 EEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> From: "mche...@s-opensource.com"
>
> When we added support for omap3, back in 2010, we added a new
> type of V4L2 devices that aren't fully controlled via the
Hi Mauro,
Thanks for the update. A few more small comments below.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 06:40:05AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> From: "mche...@s-opensource.com"
>
> When we added support for omap3, back in 2010, we added a new
> type of V4L2 devices that
On 25/08/17 11:40, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> From: "mche...@s-opensource.com"
>
> When we added support for omap3, back in 2010, we added a new
> type of V4L2 devices that aren't fully controlled via the V4L2
> device node. Yet, we never made it clear, at the V4L2
From: "mche...@s-opensource.com"
When we added support for omap3, back in 2010, we added a new
type of V4L2 devices that aren't fully controlled via the V4L2
device node. Yet, we never made it clear, at the V4L2 spec,
about the differences between both types.
Let's