> Am 10.05.2018 um 18:42 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> :
>
> Em Thu, 10 May 2018 09:38:46 -0600
> Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
>
>> On Thu, 10 May 2018 11:21:13 -0300
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>
>>> The problem with a hint-based mechanism is that it will generate
>>> false hints. If ad
Em Thu, 10 May 2018 18:52:20 +0200
Andrea Parri escreveu:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 07:15:59AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 May 2018 14:23:35 +0200
> > Andrea Parri wrote:
> >
> > > only
> > > remember that other people (including some developers running into the
> > > "disadv
Em Thu, 10 May 2018 13:42:58 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> Em Thu, 10 May 2018 09:38:46 -0600
> Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
>
> > On Thu, 10 May 2018 11:21:13 -0300
> > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> > > The problem with a hint-based mechanism is that it will generate
> > > false
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 07:15:59AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2018 14:23:35 +0200
> Andrea Parri wrote:
>
> > only
> > remember that other people (including some developers running into the
> > "disadventure" of opening an RST doc. from their preferred text editor
> > and bein
Em Thu, 10 May 2018 09:38:46 -0600
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> On Thu, 10 May 2018 11:21:13 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > The problem with a hint-based mechanism is that it will generate
> > false hints. If added, we may end by needing to add extra tags to
> > disable the hints mec
On Thu, 10 May 2018 11:21:13 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The problem with a hint-based mechanism is that it will generate
> false hints. If added, we may end by needing to add extra tags to
> disable the hints mechanism where it gets wrong, or to periodically
> do code changes at kernel-
Em Thu, 10 May 2018 07:30:12 -0600
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> On Thu, 10 May 2018 06:38:05 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > (Peter said):
> > > Independent of any philosophical discussion not allowing a setence to
> > > end with a single ':' is completely idiotic. Please fix the t
On Thu, 10 May 2018 07:30:12 -0600
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > (Peter said):
> > > Independent of any philosophical discussion not allowing a setence to
> > > end with a single ':' is completely idiotic. Please fix the tooling
> > > instead to allow it, as it is very important for being able to
On Thu, 10 May 2018 06:38:05 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> (Peter said):
> > Independent of any philosophical discussion not allowing a setence to
> > end with a single ':' is completely idiotic. Please fix the tooling
> > instead to allow it, as it is very important for being able to jus
On Thu, 10 May 2018 14:23:35 +0200
Andrea Parri wrote:
> only
> remember that other people (including some developers running into the
> "disadventure" of opening an RST doc. from their preferred text editor
> and being brought to conclude: "WTH! I need to open a web browser, I
> guess...") _us
Em Thu, 10 May 2018 14:20:36 +0200
Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 06:38:05AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Thu, 10 May 2018 01:38:38 -0700
> > Christoph Hellwig escreveu:
> >
> > > > * Use either while holding wait_queue_head::lock or when used for
> > > >
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 08:45:18AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 10:41:20 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > This is easily done by using "::" instead of just ":".
> >
> > And I'll voice my objection once again. This makes a regular comment
> > worse. This rst stuff is
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 06:38:05AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Thu, 10 May 2018 01:38:38 -0700
> Christoph Hellwig escreveu:
>
> > > * Use either while holding wait_queue_head::lock or when used for
> > > wakeups
> > > - * with an extra smp_mb() like:
> > > + * with an extra smp_m
Em Thu, 10 May 2018 01:38:38 -0700
Christoph Hellwig escreveu:
> > * Use either while holding wait_queue_head::lock or when used for wakeups
> > - * with an extra smp_mb() like:
> > + * with an extra smp_mb() like::
>
> Independent of any philosophical discussion not allowing a setence to
>
> * Use either while holding wait_queue_head::lock or when used for wakeups
> - * with an extra smp_mb() like:
> + * with an extra smp_mb() like::
Independent of any philosophical discussion not allowing a setence to
end with a single ':' is completely idiotic. Please fix the tooling
instead to
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 12:35:40PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 17:20:26 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > The whole rst wankery is detrimental to that interface in order to
> > pander to something else.. I don't see the value. I've objected before,
> > and I suppose I'll
> Am 09.05.2018 um 20:35 schrieb Jonathan Corbet :
>
>> Why should I care for people not using text editors to write code?
Eh? .. why must readers write code?
We have rules how to write kernel-doc markup since the beginning of the century.
If you do not want to contribute kernel-doc markups, th
On Wed, 9 May 2018 17:20:26 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The whole rst wankery is detrimental to that interface in order to
> pander to something else.. I don't see the value. I've objected before,
> and I suppose I'll object again.
One person's wankery is another's integrated, browsable, and s
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 08:45:18AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 10:41:20 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > This is easily done by using "::" instead of just ":".
> >
> > And I'll voice my objection once again. This makes a regular comment
> > worse. This rst stuff is
On Wed, 9 May 2018 10:41:20 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > This is easily done by using "::" instead of just ":".
>
> And I'll voice my objection once again. This makes a regular comment
> worse. This rst stuff is utter shit for making normal text files less
> readable in your favourite text
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 06:35:49AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The flow diagram should be inside a code-block to avoid those
> warnings:
> ./include/linux/wait.h:110: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank
> line; unexpected unindent.
> ./include/linux/wait.h:113: WARNING:
The flow diagram should be inside a code-block to avoid those
warnings:
./include/linux/wait.h:110: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank
line; unexpected unindent.
./include/linux/wait.h:113: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
./include/linux/wait.h:115: WARNING: Block q
22 matches
Mail list logo