On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 17:59:27 +0300
Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > Is this the right syntax? Should we rather have:
> >
> > .. kernel-doc:: lib/idr.c
> >:functions: *
>
> IMHO :functions: with no parameters is simpler.
What I would really like to have there, actually, is a regex
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 04:21:56AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:05:10AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > @@ -488,14 +488,19 @@ doc: *title*
> > .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_audio.c
> > :doc: High Definition Audio over HDMI and Display Port
> >
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:05:10AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> @@ -488,14 +488,19 @@ doc: *title*
> .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_audio.c
> :doc: High Definition Audio over HDMI and Display Port
>
> -functions: *function* *[...]*
> +functions: *[ function ...]*
>
When kernel-doc:: specified in .rst document without explicit directives,
it outputs both comment and DOC: sections. If a DOC: section was explicitly
included in the same document it will be duplicated. For example, the
output generated for Documentation/core-api/idr.rst [1] has "IDA
description"
