The rt-mutex-design documents didn't gotten meaningful update from its
first version. Even after owner's pending bit was removed in commit 8161239a8bcc
("rtmutex: Simplify PI algorithm and make highest prio task get lock")
and priority list 'plist' changed to rbtree. And Peter Zijlstra did some
cle
On 05/25/2017 01:26 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> Reviewers: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Thomas Duetsch, and Randy Dunlap
>
> @@ -779,3 +554,4 @@ Updates
> ---
>
> This document was originally written for 2.6.17-rc3-mm1
> +was updated on 4.12-rc1
> --
This is the only change from v2 versi
Hi Steven & Sebastian,
If there are no more comments, could you like to give reviewed-by? :)
Regards
Alex
On 05/25/2017 01:26 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> The rt-mutex-design documents didn't gotten meaningful update from its
> first version. Even after owner's pending bit was removed in commit
> 8161
On 05/25/2017 01:26 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>
> Author: Steven Rostedt
> +Updated: Alex Shi - 5/20/2017
>
> Reviewers: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Thomas Duetsch, and Randy Dunlap
>
> @@ -779,3 +554,4 @@ Updates
> ---
>
> This document was originally written for 2.6.17-rc3-
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:22:52 +0800
Alex Shi wrote:
> On 05/25/2017 01:26 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> >
> > Author: Steven Rostedt
> > +Updated: Alex Shi - 5/20/2017
> >
> > Reviewers: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Thomas Duetsch, and Randy Dunlap
> >
> > @@ -779,3 +554,4 @@ Updates
> >
On Thu, 25 May 2017 13:26:32 +0800
Alex Shi wrote:
> The rt-mutex-design documents didn't gotten meaningful update from its
> first version. Even after owner's pending bit was removed in commit
> 8161239a8bcc
> ("rtmutex: Simplify PI algorithm and make highest prio task get lock")
> and priority
Hi Steven,
Thanks a lot for detailed review. Every suggestion were token except one need
extra review: the 'Waking up in loop'. Is this OK or need more further change?
BTW, I didn't add you on Reviewers, since you are author already. :)
Best regards
Alex
On 07/04/2017 02:49 AM, Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 10:39:28 +0800
Alex Shi wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> Thanks a lot for detailed review. Every suggestion were token except one need
> extra review: the 'Waking up in loop'. Is this OK or need more further change?
>
> BTW, I didn't add you on Reviewers, since you are author already.
On 07/06/2017 09:25 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> This looks fine.
>
Thanks a lot!
>>
>>
>>
>> -Reviewers: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Thomas Duetsch, and Randy Dunlap
>> +Reviewers: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Thomas Duetsch, Randy Dunlap
>> + and Sebastian Siewior
