On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> This is PATCH v5 for KASLR memory implementation for x86_64.
The effects of this on the kernel_page_table addresses is impressive!
This is working well for me, and I think everything looks clean now.
I've got the series up in my tree with s
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> I'm travelling this week, but I'll try to spend some time on it.
>
> -Kees
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> Any feedback on the patch? Ingo? Kees?
>>
>> Kees mentioned he will take care of the build warning on the K
I'm travelling this week, but I'll try to spend some time on it.
-Kees
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> Any feedback on the patch? Ingo? Kees?
>
> Kees mentioned he will take care of the build warning on the KASLR
> refactor (the function is not used right now).
>
> Than
Any feedback on the patch? Ingo? Kees?
Kees mentioned he will take care of the build warning on the KASLR
refactor (the function is not used right now).
Thanks,
Thomas
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> This is PATCH v5 for KASLR memory implementation for x86_64.
>
> Rece
This is PATCH v5 for KASLR memory implementation for x86_64.
Recent changes:
Add performance information on commit.
Add details on PUD alignment.
Add information on testing against the KASLR bypass exploit.
Rebase on next-20160511 and merge recent KASLR changes.
Integrate feedb