Re: [PATCH v5 01/46] pwm: rcar: make use of pwm_is_enabled()

2016-04-14 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Thierry On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:01:52 +0200 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:24PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Commit 5c31252c4a86 ("pwm: Add the pwm_is_enabled() helper") introduced a > > new function to test whether a PWM device is enabled or not without > > manipul

Re: [PATCH v5 01/46] pwm: rcar: make use of pwm_is_enabled()

2016-04-12 Thread Thierry Reding
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:24PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Commit 5c31252c4a86 ("pwm: Add the pwm_is_enabled() helper") introduced a > new function to test whether a PWM device is enabled or not without > manipulating PWM internal fields. > Hiding this is necessary if we want to smoothly mo

[PATCH v5 01/46] pwm: rcar: make use of pwm_is_enabled()

2016-03-30 Thread Boris Brezillon
Commit 5c31252c4a86 ("pwm: Add the pwm_is_enabled() helper") introduced a new function to test whether a PWM device is enabled or not without manipulating PWM internal fields. Hiding this is necessary if we want to smoothly move to the atomic PWM config approach without impacting PWM drivers. Fix t