Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Modules: Introduce boot-time module signature flexibility

2023-11-20 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 10:33 -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 02:56:53PM +0100, Alessandro Carminati wrote: > > Il giorno gio 16 nov 2023 alle ore 18:35 Luis Chamberlain > > ha scritto: > > > > > > I see the code which skips module signature verification and the knobs > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Modules: Introduce boot-time module signature flexibility

2023-11-17 Thread Luis Chamberlain
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 02:56:53PM +0100, Alessandro Carminati wrote: > Il giorno gio 16 nov 2023 alle ore 18:35 Luis Chamberlain > ha scritto: > > > > I see the code which skips module signature verification and the knobs > > but I don't see the code which complete the promise to do the actual >

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Modules: Introduce boot-time module signature flexibility

2023-11-17 Thread Alessandro Carminati
Hello Luis, Thanks a lot for sharing your thoughts about this topic. Il giorno gio 16 nov 2023 alle ore 18:35 Luis Chamberlain ha scritto: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:27:38AM +, Alessandro Carminati (Red Hat) > wrote: > > This commit introduces a novel boot argument parameter that provid

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Modules: Introduce boot-time module signature flexibility

2023-11-16 Thread Luis Chamberlain
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:27:38AM +, Alessandro Carminati (Red Hat) wrote: > This commit introduces a novel boot argument parameter that provides an > advanced level of control over the verification of module signatures > during the initial stages of booting. With this enhancement, we gain the