On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:13:12PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:16:09PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote:
> > Do you have suggestion of next move of upstreaming ILP32?
>
> I mentioned the steps a few time before. I'm pasting them again here:
>
> 1. Complete the review
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:16:09PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote:
> Do you have suggestion of next move of upstreaming ILP32?
I mentioned the steps a few time before. I'm pasting them again here:
1. Complete the review of the Linux patches and ABI (no merge yet)
2. Review the corresponding glib
Hi, Catalin, Guys
Do you have suggestion of next move of upstreaming ILP32?
There are already the test results of lmbench and specint. Do you they are ok
or need more data to prove no regression?
I have also noticed that there are ILP32 failures in glibc testsuite. Is it the
only blocker for me
Hi, Maxim
On 2016/11/17 13:02, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Hi Bamvor,
I'm surprised that you see this much difference from ILP32 patches on SPEC
CPU2006int at all. The SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks spend almost no time in the
kernel syscalls. I can imagine memory, TLB, and cache handling in the kernel
Hi Bamvor,
I'm surprised that you see this much difference from ILP32 patches on SPEC
CPU2006int at all. The SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks spend almost no time in the
kernel syscalls. I can imagine memory, TLB, and cache handling in the kernel
could affect CPU2006 benchmarks. Do ILP32 patches touc
Hi, all
I test specint of aarch64 LP64 when aarch32 el0 disable/enabled respectively
and compare with ILP32 unmerged kernel(4.8-rc6) in our arm64 board. I found
that difference(ILP32 disabled/ILP32 unmerged) is bigger when aarch32 el0 is
enabled, compare with aarch32 el0 disabled kernel. And bzip
[Add Steve Ellcey, thanks for testing on ThunderX]
Lmbench-3.0-a9 testing is performed on ThunderX machine to check that
ILP32 series does not add performance regressions for LP64. Test
summary is in the table below. Our measurements doesn't show
significant performance regression of LP64 if ILP32
