>>> Something like:
>>>
>>> "because there is a dump_stack() done on allocation failures
>>> without __GFP_JNOWARN"
>>
>> How do you think about to convert such a description into a special format
>> for further reference documentation?
>
> I think it's a bad idea if it's a "special" format.
Wil
On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 13:35 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > > > Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this
> > > > > function.
> > > > >
> > > > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
[]
> > > Do you see any need that I should extend subsequent commit
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
>>>
>>> Applied to modules-next, thanks.
>>
>> Thanks for your acceptance of this update suggestion after a bit o
>> This is a small allocation so it can't fail in current kernels. I can't
>> imagine a situation where this could fail and it wasn't dead easy to
>> debug. Most modules are loaded at boot so it's not likely to fail, but
>> if it did, it would be easy to reproduce. If it's not loaded at boot
>>
