Hi,
I'm trying to debug some problems with my Dvico Dual Digital 4 card
(using patches from
http://fremnet.net/article/228/dvico-fusionhdtv-dual-digital-4-under-linux)
and I've noticed in dmesg that the firmware seems to get written to
the card every second or two.
This is the repeating part of t
>> Joacim wrote:
>>> I executed dvbsnoop (with -s singal) during a scan and when finding channels
>>> I
>>> got:
>>> Sig: ~46000
>>> SNR: 0 (?)
>>> BER: 0
>>>
>>> Can I trust the values from dvbsnoop?? Any better tool??
>>
>> I use femon from the dvb-tools package (or the VDR-plugin named the s
Hi Everybody,
This is Preeya.Iam new to this mailing list..
I have a custom built board,which is having a Pcmcia slot.So as per
the En50221 standard,wheneve i insert a CAM card some low level initialisation
has to take place.This implies i need to access Attribute memory of th
Hi Everybody,
This is Preeya.Iam new to this mailing list..
I have a custom built board,which is having a Pcmcia slot.So as per
the En50221 standard,wheneve i insert a CAM card some low level initialisation
has to take place.This implies i need to access Attribute memory of th
> Joacim wrote:
>> I executed dvbsnoop (with -s singal) during a scan and when finding channels
>> I
>> got:
>> Sig: ~46000
>> SNR: 0 (?)
>> BER: 0
>>
>> Can I trust the values from dvbsnoop?? Any better tool??
>
> I use femon from the dvb-tools package (or the VDR-plugin named the same).
>
>
Henk wrote:
> Of course from a kernel perspective it is a simple addition, but where
> should we form a userspace perspective decide on which signal strength
> function to use?
>
> I don't think an extra interface should be needed here.
>
Henk,
This is an addition to the *internal* API -- This
Maillist jarkeborn.se> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 08:06 +0100, Nicolas Will wrote:
> >>wa
> >> > At the server I have a 1-2 splitter
> >>
> >> Good quality splitter? Nothing plastic, ugly little metallic boxes are
> >> usually better.
> >
> > You will want stuff like that
> >
> >
Sorry,
My mistake, I was under the impression that "read_rf_strength" was
already a tuner interface.
So in that case it would be usefull to have included in the tuner interface.
Still policy on whether it is reported to userspace should reside
within the demod driver as outlined below I think.
Of course from a kernel perspective it is a simple addition, but where
should we form a userspace perspective decide on which signal strength
function to use?
I don't think an extra interface should be needed here.
For example if a demodulator is unable to provide signal strengths on
his own the
Hi,
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, zhenhao huang wrote:
> * * I had been trying to work with demod board ,but i haven't been able to
> communicate
> with the part of tuner,so anyone can advice me how to set demodulator i2c
> interface in
> "bridge" mode.
>
> Here is our platform i2c write mode.
> Write
Hi,
On 8/31/07, mimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> so I have patched my kernel and compiled qemu with pciproxy patches. I've
> put
> the commands I've used on the linux tv wiki
> http://linuxtv.org/v4lwiki/index.php/Qemu
>
did you ever read:
http://mcentral.de/wiki/index.php/QemuPciproxy
I
* * I had been trying to work with demod board ,but i haven't been able to
communicate
with the part of tuner,so anyone can advice me how to set demodulator i2c
interface in
"bridge" mode.
Here is our platform i2c write mode.
Write mode Start | Circuit_Address | 0 | Ack REGISTER_address| Ack | Da
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 09:38 +0200, Maillist wrote:
> - The amplifier is Televés 5523,
> http://www.kjell.com/?item=30294&path=50,200,320
As long as it is on-antenna, it should be fine.
For the rest, it sounds all good too.
Nico
___
linux
Joacim wrote:
> I executed dvbsnoop (with -s singal) during a scan and when finding channels
> I got:
> Sig: ~46000
> SNR: 0 (?)
> BER: 0
>
> Can I trust the values from dvbsnoop?? Any better tool??
I use femon from the dvb-tools package (or the VDR-plugin named the same).
/Richard
___
En/na Daniel Klose ha escrit:
> after a while it also shows this line: Quantek QT1010 successfully
> identified.
> but i cant really tell you after what time it shows this.
when you first open the device it tries to access the tuner.
>
> scan -n -o zap -p
> /usr/share/doc/dvb-utils/examples/
> On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 08:06 +0100, Nicolas Will wrote:
>>
>> > At the server I have a 1-2 splitter
>>
>> Good quality splitter? Nothing plastic, ugly little metallic boxes are
>> usually better.
>
> You will want stuff like that
>
> Low Insertion loss splitters, high separation
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
