Re: [linux-dvb] [patch 3/6] rename scan into dvbscan again

2006-09-07 Thread Andrew de Quincey
On Thursday 07 September 2006 19:13, Christoph Pfister wrote: > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 15:08 schrieb Ludwig Nussel: > > Change got lost during Makefile refactoring > > > > Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [snip] > > It didn't get lost, it was intentional (because of atsc users

Re: [linux-dvb] [patch 3/6] rename scan into dvbscan again

2006-09-07 Thread Christoph Pfister
Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 20:18 schrieb Andrew de Quincey: > On Thursday 07 September 2006 19:13, Christoph Pfister wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 15:08 schrieb Ludwig Nussel: > > > Change got lost during Makefile refactoring > > > > > > Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [linux-dvb] [patch 3/6] rename scan into dvbscan again

2006-09-07 Thread Michael Krufky
Andrew de Quincey wrote: > BTW: I think it should go back to being "dvbscan"... the reason it was > changed > from scan->dvbscan in the first place was because it was clashing with > another util called "scan". ATSC users are using the DVB subsystem after > all... > > Unless someone can sugges

Re: [linux-dvb] [patch 3/6] rename scan into dvbscan again

2006-09-07 Thread Christoph Pfister
Hi, Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 15:08 schrieb Ludwig Nussel: > Change got lost during Makefile refactoring > > Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [snip] It didn't get lost, it was intentional (because of atsc users ... and having the same binary twice for dvbscan and atscscan isn't nice eithe

Re: [linux-dvb] [patch 3/6] rename scan into dvbscan again

2006-09-07 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:08:20PM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote: > Change got lost during Makefile refactoring It isn't necessary to rename to source files for renaming the binaries. A small Makefile patch would be better. Thanks, Johannes ___ linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] [patch 3/6] rename scan into dvbscan again

2006-09-08 Thread Ludwig Nussel
On Thursday 07 September 2006 20:18, Andrew de Quincey wrote: > On Thursday 07 September 2006 19:13, Christoph Pfister wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 15:08 schrieb Ludwig Nussel: > > > Change got lost during Makefile refactoring > > > > > > Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [sni

Re: [linux-dvb] [patch 3/6] rename scan into dvbscan again

2006-09-08 Thread Ludwig Nussel
On Thursday 07 September 2006 19:38, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:08:20PM +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote: > > Change got lost during Makefile refactoring > > It isn't necessary to rename to source files for renaming > the binaries. A small Makefile patch would be better. He

Re: [linux-dvb] [patch 3/6] rename scan into dvbscan again

2006-09-18 Thread Andrew de Quincey
On Friday 08 September 2006 08:41, Ludwig Nussel wrote: > On Thursday 07 September 2006 20:18, Andrew de Quincey wrote: > > On Thursday 07 September 2006 19:13, Christoph Pfister wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 15:08 schrieb Ludwig Nussel: > > > > Change got lost during Makefile refac