Am 17.08.2001, schrieb Dave Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ...
> > Like the line number of the channels.conf file, the PNR is just one
number.
> > Unlike the line number, the PNR uniquely identifies the channel.
> Sadly, the PNR isn't unique in general. It is possibly true at 19E, but
not
> at o
On Friday 17 August 2001 12:07 am, you wrote:
> Like the line number of the channels.conf file, the PNR is just one number.
> Unlike the line number, the PNR uniquely identifies the channel.
Sadly, the PNR isn't unique in general. It is possibly true at 19E, but not
at other positions
For exam
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> > to use the PNR instead of the line number of the channels.conf
> > file.
> Frankly, I like it the way it is right now.
>
> If you put all the information from the channel list into the timer,
> then what if you modify a channel?
Like the line number of the
Carsten Koch wrote:
>
> Rainer Zocholl wrote:
> >
> > Just found VDR recording a completely wrong program...#5 instead of #1
> >
> > After a while i found that this is caused by the timer format:
> > The timer contains only the number in teh channel list :-(
> >
> > Meanwhile i had resorted the c
Rainer Zocholl wrote:
>
> Just found VDR recording a completely wrong program...#5 instead of #1
>
> After a while i found that this is caused by the timer format:
> The timer contains only the number in teh channel list :-(
>
> Meanwhile i had resorted the channel list...so 5 becomes
> an othe
Am 16.08.2001, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rainer Zocholl)
...
> The timer contains only the number in teh channel list :-(
> Meanwhile i had resorted the channel list...so 5 becomes
> an other program.
> The timers were not back annotated. (OK: how should it be done?)
AFAIR if you use VDRs cha
