Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86/mm/ASLR: Propagate base load address calculation"

2015-03-16 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> From: Borislav Petkov >> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:57:56 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "x86/mm/ASLR: Propagate base load address >> calculation" >> >> This reverts commit f47233c2d34f243ecdaac

Re: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] efi: Capsule update with user helper interface

2015-03-16 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Mar 13, 2015 7:42 AM, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:47:54PM +, Matt Fleming wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Mar, at 08:51:59AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > > > I'm not 100% happy with write(2) (which is all we have in sysfs) for > > > two reasons: > > > > > > 1. If we

Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86/mm/ASLR: Propagate base load address calculation"

2015-03-16 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:59:23AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > In addition to what you've said, I have only one proposal: we revert > > the whole crap and do it again, this time nice and clean in tip. It'll > > stay there as long as it has to. No

[PATCH] Revert "x86/mm/ASLR: Propagate base load address calculation"

2015-03-16 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:59:23AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > In addition to what you've said, I have only one proposal: we revert > the whole crap and do it again, this time nice and clean in tip. It'll > stay there as long as it has to. No half-arsed commit messages, no > misunderstood crap,