From: Dmitry Safonov
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 17:26:55 +0100
> Well, I think, I'll rework my patches set according to critics and
> separate compat xfrm layer. I've already a selftest to check that 32/64
> bit xfrm works - so the most time-taking part is done.
The way you've done the compat
On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 09:48 -0700, Nathan Harold wrote:
> We (Android) are very interested in removing the restriction for 32-
> bit userspace processes accessing xfrm netlink on 64-bit kernels.
> IPsec support is required to pass Android conformance tests, and any
> manufacturer wishing to ship
:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-Richter/ima-add-support-for-arch-specific-policies/20180728-072442
base:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git
next-integrity
smatch warnings:
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:522 ima_init_arch_policy
