On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:13:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 2:41 PM Chao Fan wrote:
>>
>> Imitate the ACPI code of parsing ACPI tables to dig and read ACPI
>> tables.
>
>Why?
Sorry for that, I have sent the cover letter to you.
>
>> Since some operations are not
Hi folks,
even after commit eeb89e2bb1ac ("x86/efi: Load fixmap GDT in
efi_call_phys_epilog()"), my i386/efi qemu boot tests still crash randomly
(roughly 5-10% of the time). As before, I don't see much useful output in
the qemu log (this time it doesn't even complain about a triple fault).
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 2:41 PM Chao Fan wrote:
>
> Imitate the ACPI code of parsing ACPI tables to dig and read ACPI
> tables.
Why?
> Since some operations are not needed here,
What operations?
> functions are simplified. Functions will be used to dig SRAT tables to get
> information of
Hi All,
> Changes from V4 to V5:
> --
> 1. Drop config option that enables efi page fault handler, instead make
>it default.
> 2. Call schedule() in an infinite loop to account for spurious wake ups.
> 3. Introduce "NONE" as an efi runtime service function identifier so
From: Sai Praneeth
As per the UEFI specification, after the call to ExitBootServices(),
accesses by the firmware to any memory regions except
EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_ regions is considered illegal. A buggy
firmware could trigger these illegal accesses when an efi runtime
service is invoked and if
From: Sai Praneeth
There may exist some buggy UEFI firmware implementations that access efi
memory regions other than EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_ even after
the kernel has assumed control of the platform. This violates UEFI
specification. Hence, provide a efi specific page fault handler which
recovers
From: Sai Praneeth
After the kernel has booted, if any accesses by firmware causes a page
fault, the efi page fault handler would freeze efi_rts_wq and schedules
a new process. To do this, the efi page fault handler needs
efi_rts_work. Hence, make it accessible.
There will be no race conditions
On 10 September 2018 at 21:03, Eugene Korenevsky wrote:
> Use gpt_header.sizeof_partition_entry instead of sizeof(gpt_entry)
> for GPT entry size.
> According to UEFI spec, GPT entry size is specified in GPT header.
>
I think this patch is probably correct, but could you please provide
more
Use gpt_header.sizeof_partition_entry instead of sizeof(gpt_entry)
for GPT entry size.
According to UEFI spec, GPT entry size is specified in GPT header.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Korenevsky
---
block/partitions/efi.c | 26 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14
Imitate the ACPI code of parsing ACPI tables to dig and read ACPI
tables. Since some operations are not needed here, functions are
simplified. Functions will be used to dig SRAT tables to get
information of memory, so that KASLR can the memory in immovable node.
And also, these functions won't
* Aaron Ma wrote:
> if (efi_fb)
> return (efi_fb + start);
Just noticed this detail unrelated to your patch: return is not a function.
Thanks,
Ingo
11 matches
Mail list logo