On 03/15/17 at 02:13pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> PING!
>
> Is there any suggestion for this code bug fix?
>
> Boris added comment in patch 1/2 thread that it can also be fixed by
> swapping the naming - EFI_VA_START and EFI_VA_END. As he said the
> swapping can remove the confusion about the naming, w
PING!
Is there any suggestion for this code bug fix?
Boris added comment in patch 1/2 thread that it can also be fixed by
swapping the naming - EFI_VA_START and EFI_VA_END. As he said the
swapping can remove the confusion about the naming, while the con is
changing it now could confuse more peopl
Thanks for the change.
Acked-by: Thomas Garnier
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>> On 03/08/17 at 03:47pm, Baoquan He wrote:
>>> EFI allocates runtime services regions top-down, starting from EFI_VA_START
>>> to EFI_VA_
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 03/08/17 at 03:47pm, Baoquan He wrote:
>> EFI allocates runtime services regions top-down, starting from EFI_VA_START
>> to EFI_VA_END. So EFI_VA_START is bigger than EFI_VA_END and is the end of
>> EFI region. The upper boundary of memory reg
On 03/08/17 at 03:47pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> EFI allocates runtime services regions top-down, starting from EFI_VA_START
> to EFI_VA_END. So EFI_VA_START is bigger than EFI_VA_END and is the end of
> EFI region. The upper boundary of memory regions randomized by KASLR should
> be EFI_VA_END if it's
EFI allocates runtime services regions top-down, starting from EFI_VA_START
to EFI_VA_END. So EFI_VA_START is bigger than EFI_VA_END and is the end of
EFI region. The upper boundary of memory regions randomized by KASLR should
be EFI_VA_END if it's adjacent to EFI region, but not EFI_VA_START.
Cor